The HRCI Research Hub brings together original studies, workforce polling, reports, and expert analysis, so you can act on what's happening now and prepare for what's next.
The State of HR Featured ReportsRecovery as a Workforce Strategy
Drawing on HRCI research, workforce data, and expert insight, this report examines the workplace impact of substance use disorder and the practical steps HR can take to strengthen culture, manager readiness, benefits, policies, and recovery support.
.png?sfvrsn=19b9ec76_1)
Original research and expert analysis on the issues shaping HR today, from workforce safety and emerging technology to DEI and employee well-being.
From return-to-office decisions and hybrid work to contractors and other non-traditional workers, this HRCI report explores the latest research and how HR can use data to make more informed, evidence-based workplace decisions.
From career paths to culture, this research identifies what actually separates HR professionals who are just getting by from those who are truly fulfilled—and what leaders can do to close that gap and build a more committed team.
This research uncovers where professional development is falling short, from misaligned training priorities to gaps in AI readiness, and what it takes to build a workforce equipped for what's next.
From bullying, political tension to substance use and violence prevention, this research covers workplace safety—what the data reveals, what's at stake, and what you can do to reduce risk and build a more resilient organization.
The State of HR
Based on HRCI’s survey of thousands of HR professionals, the State of HR report examines the issues defining the profession today. From AI and workplace culture to talent, leadership, and career growth, the report reveals how HR teams are adapting to change and preparing for the future. Explore the data, trends, and insights shaping the world of work below.
Download the Full ReportState of HR Spotlight Reports
Half of HR professionals work in environments marked by polarized viewpoints, and 4 in 10 describe their stress as extreme or high. Find out what the data reveals about conflict, mental health, and what it means for your organization.
HR professionals are broadly optimistic about their field — but over 4 in 10 are considering careers outside of it. Explore what's driving both the enthusiasm and the tension, and what it takes to build a team of true HR believers.
71% of HR professionals use AI regularly, yet more than half say implementing new technology is the area they feel least prepared to handle. See where the preparation gap is widest and what needs to change now.
83% of HR professionals believe remote work benefits organizations—but the debate is far from settled. Get the data on where HR stands on flexibility, productivity, and the return-to-office conversation.

More Insights for HR Professionals
Explore the issues shaping HR today and get the data you need to lead with confidence, make informed decisions, and move the profession forward.
Recovery friendly workplaces reduce absenteeism, improve retention, and strengthen workplace culture—yet most organizations haven't made meaningful progress. This HRCI and Fors Marsh research reveals why: stigma, undertrained HR teams, and weak leadership buy-in top the list. Understand where the gaps are and what organizations that get it right do differently.
Earning an HRCI certification builds earning power. Within four years, the median HRCI certificant earns 33% more than they did before getting certified. That's double the salary growth of comparable HR professionals over the same period. See what the data shows about the career and financial impact of HRCI certification.
HR is ready to lead, but is the organization ready to let it? This 2024 HRCI and MindEdge research report surfaces a striking disconnect: while 88% of HR professionals believe HR should drive business strategy, only half say leadership agrees. Add in underfunding, understaffing, and persistent burnout, and the case for rethinking HR's role has never been stronger.
AI is reshaping the workplace, and HR professionals are watching closely. This HRCI and MindEdge survey of HR practitioners reveals how the profession is navigating AI adoption, persistent burnout, rising turnover, and the evolving push and pull of remote work. Find out where your peers stand, and what the data means for the work you do every day.
Browse our complete library of research reports, guides, and frameworks. Whether you're building a business case, navigating a workforce challenge, or staying ahead of what's next, the intelligence you need is here.
From rising absenteeism to safety risks, HRCI research reveals how extreme weather is reshaping workforce management and what HR can do now.
Over three-quarters of HR professionals use AI weekly, but most have had little to no training. Learn how to build real confidence and capability starting today.
Explore how HR can turn AI adoption into a strategic advantage—balancing innovation with ethical responsibility.
This research-backed guide gives HR professionals the data and practical steps to build a recovery-friendly culture that reduces risk and supports your people.
The report explores the realities of managing DEI programs in today’s climate—where values alignment, stakeholder trust, and business performance are all on the line.
This report provides critical insights and actionable strategies for HR leaders to foster a more harmonious and productive work environment.

HRCI webinars go beyond the basics. Each session unpacks the trends, data, and real-world strategies HR professionals need to lead with confidence today and adapt to what's coming next.
News and perspectives on the issues driving the HR profession forward.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a decision finding that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) exceeded its statutory authority and that the employee noncompete rule was arbitrary and capricious. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania awarded $35.8 million in back pay and liquidated damages 6,000 current and former employees of residential nursing, rehabilitation, and assisted living facilities. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finalized a rule concerning the filing and processing of petitions for Board-conducted representation elections while unfair labor practice charges are pending and following an employer’s voluntary recognition of a union as the majority-supported collective bargaining representative of the employer’s employees. The Department of Labor issued a toolkit designed to provide strategies and best practices for recruiting, hiring, retaining, and advancing workers with disabilities.
Court Sets Aside FTC Noncompete Rule – The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a decision setting aside the employee noncompete rule issued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As a result of the ruling in Ryan, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, the noncompete rule will not take effect as scheduled on September 4th. The District Court concluded that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority by issuing the noncompete rule and that the rule “is arbitrary and capricious because it is unreasonably overbroad without a reasonable explanation.”
The rule would have prohibited employers from entering into new noncompete agreements with workers as of the September 4th effective date. The rule would have prevented employers from enforcing existing noncompete agreements with the exception of senior executives, which it defined as those working in a policy making position who earned at least $151,164/year. For senior executives, the rule would only have prohibited noncompete agreements entered into after September 4th.
Ryan, LLC filed a lawsuit challenging the FTC’s employee noncompete rule. Several groups including the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and the Longview Chamber of Commerce intervened in the case on the side of the plaintiffs. The District Court earlier issued a preliminary injunction against the noncompete rule that was limited to the parties in the lawsuit. All of the parties sought summary judgment.
The District Court believed that the FTC “lacked the substantive rulemaking authority with respect to unfair methods of competition under Section 6(g)” of the Federal Trade Commission Act and therefore exceeded its statutory authority. In finding that the action of the FTC was arbitrary and capricious, the District Court stated the rule “imposes a one-size-fits-all approach with no end date, which fails to establish a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” The District Court also found that the FTC lacked evidence as to why they chose a broad prohibition against noncompete agreements rather than targeting specific noncompete agreements.
There are two other lawsuits that have been filed challenging the employee noncompete rule. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the noncompete rule against the plaintiff. The District Court limited its ruling in the Properties of the Villages v. Federal Trade Commission to the Properties of the Villages, the plaintiff in the case. By contrast, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in the case of ATS Tree Services LLC v. Federal Trade Commission that the FTC had the statutory authority to issue the noncompete rule.
DOL Announces Large Wage Recovery – The Department of Labor (DOL) advised that the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania awarded $35.8 million in overtime back wages and liquidated damages to 6,000 current and former employees of 15 residential skilled nursing, rehabilitation, and assisted living facilities. Since the violations were found to be willful, the District Court awarded liquidated damages that doubled the amount awarded to $35.8 million. The District Court judge in the case of Julie Su, Secretary of Labor v. Comprehensive Health Management Services concluded that the defendants “created and intentionally maintained a system through which employees were consistently, systematically, and willfully subjected to payroll practices that did not remotely comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act.”
According to the District Court, the employers violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by:
NLRB Finalizes Fair Choice – Employee Voice Rule – The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finalized a rule that becomes effective on September 30th and rescinds and replaces amendments the NLRB made in 2020 to its rules and regulations concerning the filing and processing of petitions for Board-conducted representation elections while unfair labor practice charges are pending and following an employer’s voluntary recognition of a union as the majority-supported collective bargaining representative of the employer’s employees. “Today’s rule restores the Board’s prior law, including longstanding principles that ensure a fair process for workers to choose whether they want representation, and provide a better foundation to allow collective bargaining relationships to thrive,” said Chairman Lauren McFerran.
According to the NLRB, the final rule restores the authority of NLRB Regional Director’s to delay a union representation election if unfair labor practice conduct is sufficiently serious to interfere with the free choice of employees and is supported by an adequate offer of proof. According to the NLRB, ”The Board's policy of holding the petition in abeyance in the face of pending unfair labor practices is designed to preserve the laboratory conditions that the Board requires for all elections and to ensure that a free and fair election can be held in an atmosphere free of any type of coercive behavior.” The final rule also supports the ability of workers and employers to establish a bargaining relationship through voluntary recognition. The final rule rescinds a 2020 rule requiring that when an employer opts to recognize voluntarily a union representing a majority of its workers, there would be a mandatory 45 day period to allow the chance for a minority of workers to demand an election questioning that choice.
DOL Issues Toolkit for Helping Workers with Disabilities
This U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) toolkit is designed to provide strategies and best practices for recruiting, hiring, retaining, and advancing workers with disabilities in good jobs in construction, manufacturing, and clean energy. This toolkit is designed primarily for use by public and private employers. The toolkit includes the following sections: defining disability, planning to include disabled workers, recruiting, and hiring disabled workers, retaining, and supporting disabled workers, advancing disabled workers, and resources.
Neil Reichenberg is the former executive director of the International Public Management Association for Human Resources. He is an attorney, a frequent writer and speaker on public policy and human resource issues and was an adjunct faculty member at George Mason University. For questions or additional information, contact Reichenberg at neilreichenberg@yahoo.com.